Uml case tool for software design and construction

What's new in 3. PDF Library. Registered Users. Enterprise Architect Pro Cloud Server. All Users. Enterprise Architect Current Release Version Resources Resources UML 2. All rights Reserved. Legal Privacy About us.

This version includes a desktop app, the browser applications, and an iPad app. Visio Standard does not support UML diagrams and is therefore not included here.

As UML tools, the Visio versions presented are primarily aimed at corporate customers who appreciate the familiar Office environment and want to optimize their workflow by seamlessly integrating the appropriate modeling tool into their existing system. If you need a comprehensive shape library with current UML notations standards and if you have already subscribed to Microsoft Office Pro , we recommend Online Plan 2. A desktop Visio version for Mac is currently not available. The previously mentioned cloud-based app, Lucidchart , can serve as a mediator since it also imports native formats from Visio.

Visio is largely limited to features that allow you to draw industry-standard vector graphics and diagrams and work in a team. If you release a diagram, authorized team members can work on it simultaneously in the document as well as exchange ideas. Visio can also be integrated with Microsoft Teams to make collaboration easier. You simply share finished sketches and prototypes via the connected cloud. If you want to create code frames from your diagrams, you need other UML tools , for example, Visual Studio from Microsoft.

As this is also part of the product family, the integrated development environment allows Visio to be integrated into the development process. Visio has neither code generation nor round-trip engineering functions. However, it enables reverse engineering where you create UML diagrams from imported data or source code. Therefore, the UML tool fulfils its main task, which consists of clearly displaying processes and systems. Visio also enables you to integrate real-time data into your diagrams with a single click.

This so-called data linking illustrates complex business processes with BPMN during their entire runtime, for example. Alternatively, you can test dependencies within a system using a UML communication diagram — live with real data. If you need to run object-oriented programming, to represent a system clearly, and also make it accessible to external specialists, you may find the Universal Modeling Language to be ideal.

UML is a modeling language, but has many other possible uses. Since the introduction of UML 2. UML activity diagrams help you to graphically illustrate the chronological sequence of system processes in object-oriented programming. They show which actions take place in which order to execute an activity. With a finished diagram, you can create code frames using XML transfer. Or do you want to map business processes? We show examples of how to create an activity diagram, which symbols belong Sequence diagrams help you depict the message flow within a system in clear detail.

A UML sequence diagram is a good choice for anyone who wants to understand a specific application case well. In object-oriented programming, sequence diagrams are suitable for checking the logic of a system. The big advantage of web services lies in their platform independence. In principle, clients and servers do not have to speak the same language, but just rely on general standards.

To find out how to work with a server, a client checks the WSDL file. This is a document based on XML, in which everything important can be found. Find out how the file is structured. With a real estate website, you can set yourself apart from the competition With the right tools, a homepage for tradesmen can be created quickly and legally compliant This article was last updated in May NET With plugin?

UML diagram tools: what to consider Unified-Modeling-Language specifies 14 diagram types that represent the structure, behavior, and interactions of a system. Use case A: simple drafts or prototypes Are you still at the beginning and only have a few initial ideas for the structure? When choosing a UML tool, ask yourself the following questions : Do I want to program based on this graphic? Is the system area that I want to illustrate very complex? Do I have much time to familiarize myself with the program?

Am I prepared to spend a large budget on simple drafts? Is a user-friendly, intuitively understandable user interface. Is available free of charge. Use case B: abstract complex systems The main task of UML is to simplify complex systems , making them understandable even for beginners. For the above use case, you need a UML diagram tool with the following features: It is platform-independent and ideally backwards compatible.

The current UML diagram types are positioned at a central point in a clear menu — with all the necessary designs. Diagrams can be created with the drag-and-drop function, keyboard input, or imported code. The program should support the import and export of whichever programming language you use. The documentation is automatically created in the background by the program. Even if an error occurs in the system, the program should still be easy to use: usability and robustness are particularly important for large-scale projects with numerous users.

Sharing and simultaneously working on a project should if not anchored in the tool at least work through integration with teamwork applications. A debugger immediately reports if errors occur in the model. Different perspectives for viewing as well as detailed model types provide an overview of the entire system and specific aspects. The tool allows simulations to eliminate error sources. Use case C: creating finished code from a model Some UML tools enable diagrams to be converted into a given programming language.

Comparison of UML tools: from free UML tools to extensive desktop versions A good tool does its job without making operation difficult with unnecessary extras. GitMind is operated using drag-and-drop. Simply drag shapes and arrows from the sidebar onto the workspace. You can change the colors and font with a double click.

MagicDraw: everything you need for professional UML diagrams MagicDraw von No Magic is the first comprehensive full version for professional modeling in this list. The workspace is divided into three panels whose tabs you can customize. The sidebar next to the workstation provides the required templates for the respective diagram as well as standard shapes. The free version of Lucidchart is a handy online tool for quickly drawing complex UML diagrams and sharing them in a team.

In the free account , you have the following UML diagram templates: Class diagram State diagram Activity diagram Sequence diagram Component diagram Use case diagram Distribution diagram If you want to design complex diagrams with more than 60 objects, you need a premium account. The familiar design and the ribbon menu make it easier for Office users to get started with Visio.

Related products. View packages. Build a real estate website With a real estate website, you can set yourself apart from the competition Handyman website With the right tools, a homepage for tradesmen can be created quickly and legally compliant Enter the web address of your choice in the search bar to check its availability. UML tool. Integrated teamwork. Supports UML version.

Suitable for. Online Mind Map Tool. Beginners, drafts. Free and low-cost premium subscription. Web-based diagram software. UML 2. Propriety software with single-user, floating, and mobile license. Desktop, platform-independent. Large companies, complex tasks. Relative high one-off payment. Browser, app for iOS and Android, plugin. Drafts, large projects, teamwork.

IBM Rational Rhapsody. Graphical development environment for model-based software development and validation. They are only logical pointers and nothing more. In the relational model, the situation is often quite different. Identity in the relational model is normally implemented with a primary key. A primary key is a set of columns in a table that together uniquely identify a row. For example, name and address may uniquely identify a 'Customer'. Where other entities, such as a 'Salesperson', reference the 'Customer', they implement a foreign key based on the 'Customer' primary key.

The problem with this approach for our purposes is the impact of having business information such as customer name and address embedded in the identifier. Imagine three or four tables all have foreign keys based on the customer primary key, and a system change requires the customer primary key to change for example to include 'customer type'. The work required to modify both the 'customer' table and the entities related by foreign key is quite large.

On the other hand, if an OID was implemented as the primary key and formed the foreign key for other tables, the scope of the change is limited to the primary table and the impact of the change is therefore much less. Also, in practice, a primary key based on business data may be subject to change.

For example a customer may change address or name. In this case the changes must be propagated correctly to all other related entities, not to mention the difficulty of changing information that is part of the primary key.

An OID always refers to the same entity - no matter what other information changes. In the above example, a customer may change name or address and the related tables require no change. When mapping object models into relational tables, it is often more convenient to implement absolute identity using OID's rather than business related primary keys.

The OID as primary and foreign key approach will usually give better load and update times for objects and minimise maintenance effort. In practice, a business related primary key might be replaced with:.

Again, the decision to use meaningful keys or OID's will depend on the exact requirements of the system being developed.

Map attributes to columns In general we will map the simple data attributes of a class to columns in the relational table.

For example a text and number field may represent a person's name and age respectively. This sort of direct mapping should pose no problem - simply select the appropriate data type in the vendor's relational model to host your class attribute.

For complex attributes ie. Map associations to foreign keys More complex class attributes ie. An association is a structural relationship between objects. For example, a Person may live at an Address. While this could be modelled as a Person has City, Street and Zip attributes, in both the object and the relational world we are inclined to structure this information as a separate entity, an Address.

In the object domain an address represents a unique physical object, possibly with a unique OID. In the relational, an address may be a row in an Address table, with other entities having a foreign key to the Address primary key.

In both models then, there is the tendency to move the address information into a separate entity. This helps to avoid redundant data and improves maintainability. So for each association in the class model, consider creating a foreign key from the child to the parent table.

Map Aggregation and Composition Aggregation and composition relationships are similar to the association relationship and map to tables related by primary-foreign key pairs. There are however, some points to bear in mind. Ordinary aggregation the weak form models relationships such as a Person resides at one or more Addresses.

In this instance, more than one person could live at the same address, and if the Person ceased to exist, the Addresses associated with them would still exist. This example parallels the many-to-many relationship in relational terminology, and is usually implemented as a separate table containing a mapping of primary keys from one table to the primary keys of another.

A second example of the weak form of aggregation is where an entity has use or exclusive ownership of another. For example, a Person entity aggregates a set of shares. This implies a Person may be associated with zero or more shares from a Share table, but each Share may be associated with zero or one Person.

If the Person ceases to exist, the Shares become un-owned or are passed to another Person. The strong form of aggregation, however, has important integrity constraints associated with it. Composition, implies that an entity is composed of parts, and those parts have a dependent relationship to the whole. A Person entity may be composed of the set of such identifying documents. If the Person is deleted from the system, then the identifying documents must be deleted also, as they are mapped to a unique individual.

In the case of the many-to-many relationship, if the parent is deleted, the entries in the intermediate table for that entity must also be deleted also. In the case of the one-to-many relationship, if the parent is deleted, the foreign key entry ie. In the case of composition, the use of a foreign key is mandatory, with the added constraint that on deletion of the parent the part must be deleted also. Logically there is also the implication with composition that the primary key of the part forms part of the primary key of the whole - for example, a Person's primary key may composed of their identifying documents ID's.

In practice this would be cumbersome, but the logical relationship holds true. Define relationship roles For each association type relationship, each end of the relationship may be further specified with role information. Figure 6 illustrates this concept. This logically defines the relationship between the two classes. In addition, you may specify additional constraints eg.

Model behaviour We now come to another difficult issue: whether to map some or all class behaviour to the functional capabilities provided by database vendors in the form of triggers, stored procedures, uniqueness and data constraints, and relational integrity.

A non-persistent object model would typically implement all the behaviour required in one or more programming languages eg. Each class will be given its required behaviour and responsibilities in the form of public, protected and private methods. Relational databases from different vendors typically include some form of programmable SQL based scripting language to implement data manipulation. The two common examples are triggers and stored procedures.

When we mix the object and relational models, the decision is usually whether to implement all the business logic in the class model, or to move some to the often more efficient triggers and stored procedures implemented in the relational DBMS.

From a purely object-oriented point of view, the answer is obviously to avoid triggers and stored procedures and place all behaviour in the classes.

This localises behaviour, provides for a cleaner design, simplifies maintenance and provides good portability between DBMS vendors. In the real world, the bottom line may be scaling to 's or 's of transactions per second, something stored procedures and triggers are purpose designed for.

If purity of design, portability, maintenance and flexibility are the main drivers, localise all behaviour in the object methods. If performance is an over-riding concern, consider delegating some behaviour to the more efficient DBMS scripting languages. Be aware though that the extra time taken to integrate the object model with the stored procedures in a safe way, including issues with remote effects and debugging, may cost more in development time than simply deploying to more capable hardware.

Produce a physical model In UML, the physical model describes how something will be deployed into the real world - the hardware platform, network connectivity, software, operating system, dll's and other components. You produce a physical model to complete the cycle - from an initial use case or domain model, through the class model and data models and finally the deployment model.

Typically for this model you will create one or more nodes that will host the database s and place DBMS software components on them. If the database is split over more than one DBMS instance, you can assign packages «schema» of tables to a single DBMS component to indicate where the data will reside.

Conclusion This concludes this short article on database modelling using the UML. As you can see, there are quite a few issues to consider when mapping from the object world to the relational. The UML provides support for bridging the gap between both domains, and together with extensions such as the UML Data Profile is a good language for successfully integrating both worlds.

Enterprise Architect Trial. Resources Database Modeling.